PROJECT BRAIN TRUST

WE'LL SHOW YOU THE LIFE OF THE MIND
book and dvd reviews
 
dictionary of wrestlingese
 
links
 
(bring it on) home
 
moves defined and symbolized
 
philosophical projects
 
who's who of wrestling

[NOTE: Abstracts are to works in progress. The Project Brain Trust Promotion is aggressively growing, and new members and paper abstracts will be posted soon. For the kind of projects forthcoming, check out the philosophical projects section.]

Project Brain Trust Web-Master & General Manager
JON COGBURN
 
homepage:
http://www.artsci.lsu.edu/phil/phil1/cogburn/index.html
 
contact:
joncogburn@yahoo.com
 
The Art of Professional Wrestling (abstract)
I utilize recent work in cognitive psychology to defend a neo-Weiszian view that the general notion of "art" is parasitic on relevant similarity to good art. Given this, the nature of art is best understood by considering goodmaking features of art, and the question of whether wrestling is art turns on whether it embodies central features of good art. A brief exploration of traditional definitions and description of canonical properties of professional wrestling ends up being extraordinarily illuminating in this light.

 RETURN TO TOP

Project Brain Trust Wrestling Historian and Drama Theorist
NEAL HEBERT
 
[with Jon Cogburn] Going the (Aesthetic) Distance (abstract)
Ever since the famed "Montreal screw job," the predetermined nature of matches in professional wrestling has been openly admitted by wrestlers and promoters alike. This raises fundamental issues about the notion of aesthetic distance. We argue that contemporary wrestling fans must not only suspend disbelief, but also suspend the suspension of disbelief in interesting ways. In this respect, professional wrestling forms perhaps the purest Brechtian theater thus far manifest.

 RETURN TO TOP

Project Brain Trust Artist
MATT MANARD
 
[with Neal Hebert] Stone Cold Stunners and Semiotics: Nuance, Relational Identity, and the Ontology of the Match (abstract)
We discuss recent aesthetic work on nuance to develop a relational ontology of wrestling matches.

 RETURN TO TOP

Project Brain Trust Associate Member
DAVID MERLI
 
Normativity's Royal Rumble: On the Nature of Rules (in Professional Wrestling) (Abstract)
Rules in professional wrestling are allegedly honored more in their breach than in their enforcement. Unfortunately, philosophers from Kant to Davidson have produced compelling arguments sabout the nature of normativity that this is a priori impossible.

 RETURN TO TOP

Project Brain Trust Associate Member
MARK SILCOX
 
Is Wrestling Fake?: A Marxist Fantasia (Abstract)
Karl Marx once famously remarked that whenever history appears to repeat itself, it always does so “the first time as tragedy, the second as farce.” In this paper, I will employ Marx’s insight to defend professional wrestling from certain sissy-assed charges that are often made against it: i.e. that it is “fake,” inauthentic, manipulative of its audience and aesthetically inferior to sports for which the outcome is not decided in advance. Along the way, I’ll provide a sketch of Marx’s economic theory of surplus value. I’ll employ this theory to answer such vexed questions as: Which Pro Wrestler kicks the most ass? Why should we all spend much more time playing video games? And who was tougher, Plato or Thomas Jefferson? I’ll conclude by outlining some responses to the familiar charge against Marxists that the type of society they aspire to bring about would impede human flourishing.

 RETURN TO TOP